IELTS Writing Task 2 – Some people think students should learn more practical courses like computer

0
17208

Some people think students should learn more practical courses like computer, but others think they should learn more about theoretical courses like geography and mathematics.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 

Same Topic  Some people think kids should learn more practical skills from classes for their future career. However, others believe that in primary level, they should learn something theoretical for a good foundation for their future development. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

You should write at least 250 words.

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay Sample

Sample Answer 1:

The debate on whether theoretical subjects are more important or practical are more
important has been raging for ages. Some individuals are of the opinion that pupils should
be taught more practical courses like computers but others hold the view that theoretical
subjects are more important. In this essay I intend to discuss both views and finally give my
opinion.

Those in favour of theoretical courses say that to be practically successful we need to have
a strong and solid theoretical foundation. Though practicality counts but it is like half
knowledge if no theoretical knowledge is gained. Moreover, theory provides powerful
tools to deal with the world around us and the body within ourselves. For example,
medical theories help us combat diseases, economic theories explain inflation and
unemployment, gravity theory explains the presence of planets. Even marketing which was
once thought to be purely practical is based on statistical data which require maths
knowledge.

Those who advocate practical courses say so because today is the era of computers and
technology. They feel that such subjects have more job opportunities. What they don’t
take into consideration is that as far as the basic knowledge of such subjects is there it is all
practical, but if you have to go into computer programming, you need to have your
mathematical concepts clear.

In my opinion, both practical and theoretical subjects go hand in hand and each has their
own significance. Theory and practical are interrelated. Theory is the basis of all practical
knowledge. For example a person becomes a doctor in five and a half years, which has four
and a half theory plus one year practical. So, for the overall development of the students a
mix of all subjects should be there.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, both theory and practical subjects have their
own importance. Both should be incorporated in the school curricula.

Model Answer 2:

Today,what type of courses should students learn become a hot-debated topic.Some people believe that students only need to learn practical courses while others hold the opinion that they also need to learn theoretical courses,for example,geography and math. The idea that learning practical courses is sufficient for today’s students is probably owing to the fast speed of development.Those people think that students’ only task is to handle practical knowledge so that it will be easy for them to do their jobs when they graduate.Therefore,they can do better work and have higher pay.

However, someone say that students need to learn theoretical courses such as geography and math. They may think that,in this way,students can have expanded horizons. Also, if they learn those subjects well,they tend to solve practical problem easily.

For me, I support the idea that students have the need to learn theoretical courses .for one reason; those subjects are the foundation of other courses. Take math for example,many pupils who are doing well in computer always good at math. For another reason,learning more courses can expand children’s horizons; their brains contain variety knowledge which will benefit their future life.People,who learn geography well, not only have the knowledge of the earth but also can recognize the roads accurately in unfamiliar places.Finally,having theoretical courses contribute to the development of science. It is interesting to find that some children who are interested in learning math or geography finally become famous scientists.So having theoretical courses provide students the opportunity to find their hobbies.

In conclusion, no matter practical courses or theoretical courses are of the same importance. I suggest students should learn theoretical ones in high school as well as some easy practical courses, and deeply study their majors when they come to universities or colleges.

Model Answer 3:

With the development of human society, there is an increasing number of individuals paying attention to our educational system. One issue has been constantly discussed is whether primary school students should learn more practical skills or they should learn something theoretical. Personally, I believe that younger students should learn theoretical knowledge.

Compared with practical skills, theoretical knowledge is easy for primary students to understand and for them to actually acquire. To be specific, students may not have the opportunity to practice the skill they acquired in their normal school lifetime. However, they can easily obtain theoretical knowledge through the daily lectures or through their textbooks. For example, students could learn the theory of why the plane can fly through the teacher’s explanation, but they could never be able to fly a real plane in their primary school. Besides, understanding the theoretical knowledge is the foundation of learning practical skills. Without the acknowledgement of basic theory, one can not practice the relevant skills. Take learning English as an example. In order to learn how to speak English, learners from non-English speaking countries have to know and understand the grammar behind the language. Grammar is the cornerstone of speaking English. No matter how much one practice, he or she would fail to obtain the language, unless he or she learns the English grammar first. In addition, some careers require theoretical knowledge. If, for instance, a student wants to be an university professor when he or she grow up. Then the student must learn a lot of theoretical knowledge. Thus, in order to find a job in a particular area, like the academic world, individual has to be equipped with theoretical knowledge.

Others may support the statement that primary level students should learn more practical skills on the ground that it is practical skills that can solve our daily life problems. They may argue that theory only exists in the book, yet in real life situation practical skill is the one that can help people to address their problems. Nevertheless, I still prefer theory than practical skills, because practical skill can only stop the problem, it cannot forever prevent or get rid of the problem. On the other hand; however, theoretical knowledge cannot only solve the problem but also stop it from happening again. People can acquire the skill so that they can protect themselves from deadly air pollution. Yet if they understand the theory of why these air pollution exists and how can geographic factors influence the movement of air pollution, individuals cannot only protect themselves from the pollution but also find a way to get rid of the pollution by using more eco-friendly fuel.

To sum up, although some one may argue that practical skills are more useful, I think theory is more important in terms of primary education.

Model Answer 4:

 While it may seem like a reasonable idea to teach more practical skills to some school students, it is not as easy as it may seem. Not all students will need skills such as repairing a car in future life, just as not all students will go on to study at university. Personally, I do not believe it is necessary for all students to learn such non-academic skills while at school; however, it may be beneficial for some students who are maybe not academically inclined.

It may be possible to introduce any additional new subjects at the expense of some of the other traditional academic subjects for certain students. This would clearly require some rethinking regarding the concept of what exactly the school education system should deliver. One of the main problems is that such skill-based classes present a whole new range of challenges which education authorities may not be able to meet. For example, a class or course based on car repair would have to take into account various brands and models not to mention the increasing technology incorporated within modern vehicles which in many cases limits the amount of work or repairs which an owner can carry out on their vehicle without the necessary equipment available at an authorized dealer for the brand. The need for such technology resources in order to deliver the course may be a limiting factor in certain cases.

Schools also need to consider that there are many practical skills which young people acquire or learn without the need for any formal training, such as in the case of social media or driving a car. Schools do not educate children how to navigate or use features of social media nor how to drive a car or even play computer or console games; however, it is clear that children learn how to do these things either though their parents, their own powers of discovery or with their own friends.

Overall, it is more important for schools to ensure that traditional academic subjects are still relevant and that course and class content is current, pertinent and engaging for students in today’s world. Arming students with essential thinking and deductive skills prepares young people for learning about a whole host of other subjects throughout their life. It is therefore unnecessary to include such subjects as car repair and managing a bank account into the standard educational curriculum.

Model Answer 5:

Get More Sample Answer – Writing Task 2

Submit your Essay here in the comment section, we will add your essay in our post. 

(Collected, Source – Book, Internet)