IELTS Writing Task 2 – Some people think that national sports teams and individual men and women


Some people think that national sports teams and individual men and women who
represent their country should be financially supported by the government.
However, others argue that they should be funded by non-government sources (e.g. Business, scholarships, etc.).

Discuss both views and give your opinion.


You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

You should write at least 250 words.

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay Sample

Sample Answer 1:

It is irrefutable that sports holds fascination for almost everyone and winning a game
in international sports events such as the World Cup or the Olympic Games is a matter
of national honour. It is a highly debatable issue whether the sports team or
sportsmen who represent their country should be funded by governments or NGOs. In
the following paragraphs I intend to delve into the advantages and disadvantages of
both approaches.

The reason why national teams and individual athletes representing a country should
be funded by the government is that, first of all, they compete against opponents
from all over the globe in international sports events for the whole nation. When they
break a record or set up a new record in a world-class tournament, they inspire
national pride and arouse patriotism among its citizens. Moreover, they also play a
diplomatic function in competitions. They act as brand ambassadors for their country
and behaviour helps strengthen the relations between countries and also improve
their nation’s image.

Those in favour of NGOs funding the national sports teams argue that this would ease
some burden off the government’s shoulders. Moreover, these businesses are profit
driven so they would provide the best coaching and facilities to their teams. The
reason why they support a team or player is that they want to make use of their
market influence to promote their products or services. So, they also get something
back by doing so.

I believe that it would be better for government to support the teams because the less
popular teams and athletes, who are equally important, are ignored by the businesses
and organisations. Without stable financial support available, they would not be able
to concentrate on training, and they would not remain dedicated to their sports.
Besides, it is still controversial for some industries such as tobacco industry to sponsor
sporting events.

To sum up, national sports teams and individual players standing for a nation should
be financially supported by the government to achieve the desired performance.


Model Answer 2:

 As a result of constant mass media attention, athletes have become the center topic of the general in recent years. This leads to the phenomenon of heated debates on the issue of who should support them financially. Some people are of the opinion that government has the responsibilities, while others are opposed to this argument, insisting on the donation from non-government organizations. Personally, I agree with the latter.

Admittedly, as part of the national affairs, sports and sports professionals are the responsibilities of the government. To be specific, government has the duties, apart from protecting national security and boosting domestic economy, to advocate the development of sports. Moreover, so much money is required in order to promote sports nationwide that only the government has the ability to achieve this goal. For instance, to cultivate world-class athletes, basic infrastructures and facilities need to be constructed along with qualified and skilled trainers needed to be hired. This involves a great amount of both money and time. Therefore, without the aid of government, it would be unlikely for sports men and women to be fostered.

However, reaching the conclusion that government plays a vital role dose necessarily indicate that government is the only one in supporting sports professionals. Instead, non-government organizations such as private owned enterprises and sports institutions are also essential. In fact, this would be a win-win situation if private businesses support athletes. That is to say, whenever a company donates money to those athletes representing their own county, the athletes earn money obviously, and this company receives public attention that acts as advertisement and increases its company image and reputation as a patriotic enterprise. This in turn will boom the business and profit of this company.

In addition, sports should not be considered as the top concern of the government. Although it is part of the government’s duty, it could never overweigh the importance of solving poverty as well as well as fighting crime. That having been said, the government should always put these two issues in priority. Thus, spending taxpayers’ money on sports would be recognized as a huge waste of domestic resources and personnel.

In conclusion, as far as I am concerned, money from private sectors should be used to boost sports, whereas government has more important issue to tackle.

Model Answer 3:

While some people believe that governments should bear the responsibility to financially support their national sport teams and individual athletes, this essay is written to argue that the involvement of entrepreneurs is also extremely beneficial.

On one hand, national sport teams have traditionally perceived as the pride of a country and therefore should only be controlled by its government. The involvement of private sectors could result in the commercialization of national sport teams, which will damage the image of a country. For this reason, there has been a general consensus that national athletes should only be managed by their government, who is not motivated by the pursuit of profit.

On the second hand, it is very difficult for the government to afford the astronomical expenditure of sport teams alone. The majority of the government’s annual budget is often allocated to other priorities, such as education, military and infrastructure, leaving little funding left for sports. On the contrary, non-government groups with their huge capital base can financially support athletes to a larger extent. Also, as sports became increasingly competitive, the need for better equipment, facilities, nutrition and training methods have grown urgent. Private sectors, with their expertise in different areas, ranging from medical to technology, can provide tremendous support to sportspersons. With the help of these entities, the performance of sport teams is believed to be markedly boosted.

In conclusion, the sole support from the government to sport teams and athletes, though necessary, is not sufficient. Only with the aid from private organisations, who are capable of providing finance and other necessities, do sportsmen can attain their full potential.

Model Answer 4:
In recent years, one of the clearest trends in sports is that more and more corporations have come into play. It is a subject of discussion whether private financing should be accepted by the government to a larger extent and even the state can concede its control over national sports teams to private ownership. In my opinion, the involvement of entrepreneurs is essential and can be deemed as a complement to government administration.

There are many reasons why the private sector should play a more active role in sports. First, the government alone cannot afford the expenditure involved in the sports industry, such as salaries of athletes, administrative costs, and so forth. By organising competitions efficiently and economically, enhancing athletes” market values, seeking out sponsors or patrons, the private sector not only raises necessary financing but also maximises the return of the sports industry. A business’s willingness to take part in this industry is attributable to many incentives. For example, it would help create an image which is associated with enthusiasm, energy and passion and can be turned into enormous income. Meanwhile it contributes a lot to its solid position in society, as well as good reputation.

Meanwhile, as sports have grown more competitive, the need for better equipment, facilities, nutrition, and training methods has become urgent. Athletes should have well-developed physiques, which can be obtained only through extensive physical training and strict exercise. Private sponsors have expertise in different areas of technology, ranging from nutrition to the treatment of injuries. They are able to train athletes scientifically and effectively, reduce the risk of injuries and extend their career lives. Besides, as private sponsors are more financially capable of providing awards, bonus and other financial incentives to motivate athletes, their involvement is crucial to athletes’ performance on the playing field.

The rule of the private sector is therefore indispensable, but it is not to say that the government should divest itself of intervening in the sports industry. Although the private sector is surely committed to seeking sponsorship and performing many fund-raising jobs, it is profit-oriented and therefore, very likely to make a decision ignorant of the interests of athletes. National teams are branded, marketed and sold as entertainment products, while the value of national pride and ethnical dignity is overlooked. It is also very likely that private investors are only interested in those sports with high media exposure, resulting in the unbalanced development of sports. For this reason, the government should retain the major ownership of the sports.

In conclusion, the sports world is in need of financial support and the assistance of the private sector. While providing financial resources, goods and services, business investors can obtain communicative and commercial benefits. By giving the green light to private financing, the government is more likely to advance the overall development of sports.

Model Answer 5:
Some people hold the opinion that it is the certain task for government to offer financial assistance to these athletes who act as representative for their country whether they are individual or collective.While some argue that it is none of government business.Those people could also be provided by some institutions like enterprise,welfare organization and so on.From my point of view,I am in favour of the latter opinion.

The first step I want to show here is that government should make effective and efficient use of money,supporting for sports may be a costly thing and bring a burden.Government should pay more attention on how to improve the quality of common people,like invests on repair or replace old facilities.If government put emphasis on sports,even the national team get good rank in competition,it really have little impact on people’s daily lives.

Another reason of providing financially supported by other organizations I think is important is that it will promote them development.For example,as the company has gave aid to the sport,the company could put its logo on athlete’s clothes for free or hold a competition in it’s company name.It is not only a good chance to help athletes receive satisfied supports but also a useful way to publicity,which I think full better than invest much money on advertisement.

For the above analysis of the two proposals,it could be noted that the former tend to bring less benefits.To put it in a more specific way,the fund of sport by the non-government organizations reduce a economic burden on the government and increase the exposure rate of them.

Get More Topic Sample Answer


Submit your Essay here in the comment section, we will add your essay in our post. 


(Collected; Source: Internet)