IELTS Writing Task 2 – Some people think government should ensure the healthy lifestyle

0
11666

Some people think government should ensure the healthy lifestyle of people, but others argue that it should be decided by individuals.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 

Same Topic

 

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

You should write at least 250 words.

 

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay Sample

Sample Answer 1:

As people are moving towards modernization, they are becoming more and more
aware about the benefits of a healthy lifestyle. I believe that the government should
hold the responsibility to encourage people to enjoy healthy lifestyle. I shall put forth
my arguments to support my views in the following paragraphs.

My first argument is that everyone does not have enough knowledge about health
and some gullible people may just follow some advertisements or unreliable
consultants who may give them inappropriate guidance. This increase the risk of
unhealthy lifestyle and therefore government should formulate policies to guide
citizens to establish healthy lifestyles.

Secondly, if government guides about healthy lifestyles, then more and more people
would be healthy and this would indirectly make the economy flourish. With healthy
body conditions, labourers work more efficiently, elderly suffer lesser diseases and
children have better development. As a result, manufactures can produce more, the
budget of social insurance can be cut down and healthy young generations will
provide stability to the growth of economy.

Last but not least, if the onus of having a healthy lifestyle is left to the individuals,
they may not follow it because of lack of time and money. So, the government should
provide free gyms, parks and other infrastructure to support a healthy lifestyle, so
that people are encouraged to adopt such a lifestyle.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, governments should promote healthy
lifestyles both for the benefits of individuals and overall economy.

Model Answer 2:

Whether healthy lifestyle should be a personal choice or should be ensured by a government is a debated issue. According to some, healthy lifestyle is a preference and this is determined by individuals while others believe that the government of a country should take care of the healthcare facilities of all citizens. Personally I believe that healthy lifestyle is a choice that should be made by each individual while the government of a country should guarantee proper treatment and healthy lifestyle facilities.

On one hand, if an individual has the determination of leading a healthy life, he would need very little help from the state. Healthy lifestyle is a habit and this is a choice made by an individual. Government can make sure better healthcare, exercise and entertainment facilities throughout the country but if someone does not have the habit to lead a healthy life, government has nothing to do about it. Interestingly, this is a choice we can make regardless of our social and economic status. For instance, a man with a lot of money might live an unhealthy lifestyle while someone with a very little earning can decide to live a good and healthy lifestyle. Thus healthy lifestyle is a choice that should be decided by individuals rather than the government of a country. It is evident that family can contribute a lot to teach a child to choose a good and healthy lifestyle.

On the other hand, there is no denying to the fact that, a government also has an important role to play to make sure better lifestyle of its citizens.  For instance in countries where the government fails to ensure proper education, healthcare facilities, recreation and economic development, people usually lead unhealthy life there. Some important laws and policies like drug controlling can determine the extent of people’s healthy lifestyle. Thus it is true that government policy and initiatives help citizens to have better lifestyle.

Considering both view points, I would like to conclude that healthy lifestyle of citizens in a country is a combination of individual choice and government initiatives and policy. Thus personally I feel that each person should choose a healthy lifestyle while the government of a country should ensure proper facilities to make it easier.

 

Model Answer 3:

Some people think government should ensure the healthy lifestyle. of people, but others argue that it should be decided by individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
As people are moving towards modernization, they are becoming more and more aware about the benefits of a healthy lifestyle. I believe that the government should hold the responsibility to encourage people to enjoy healthy lifestyle. I shall put forth my arguments to support my views in the following paragraphs.

My first argument is that everyone does not have enough knowledge about health and some gullible people may just follow some advertisements or unreliable consultants who may give them inappropriate guidance. This increase the risk of unhealthy lifestyle and therefore government should formulate policies to guide citizens to establish healthy lifestyles.

Secondly, if government guides about healthy lifestyles, then more and more people would be healthy and this would indirectly make the economy flourish. With healthy body conditions, labourers work more efficiently, elderly suffer lesser diseases and children have better development. As a result, manufactures can produce more, the budget of social insurance can be cut down and healthy young generations will provide stability to the growth of economy.

Last but not least, if the onus of having a healthy lifestyle is left to the individuals, they may not follow it because of lack of time and money. So, the government should provide free gyms, parks and other infrastructure to support a healthy lifestyle, so that people are encouraged to adopt such a lifestyle.

To conclude, governments should promote healthy lifestyles both for the benefits of individuals and overall economy.

 

Model Answer 4:

Undoubtedly, healthy and educated society is the backbone of a successful country. There is general dispute these days about whether it is government’s responsibility to provide health care and education for free or not. I think this situation calls for the concerted effect of government, individual and private organization as well.

On one side of the argument, there are people who believe that it is one of the fundamental duties of the government to ensure health care and education for it’s citizen. The principal reason for having such belief is perhaps as people in all categories are required to pay taxes to the government, they should definitely receive service from that money. In addition, if tax revenue is not sufficient, government can perform this responsibility by availing loan from international organization. At least, government should provide basic health care and education up to secondary school free of cost. For example, in Canada it is the government who pay for it’s citizen’s health care and education up to a certain level.

On the other hand, there are people who believe that individual public and private organization should run school and hospital and help to release the economic burden on government. If citizen become dependent upon government for health care and education then they ultimately become dependent on the government for everything in their lives. This would lead to a disastrous outcome in any nation because the government cannot support all of its citizen. For example, In a overpopulated country like Bangladesh, it is quite impossible for a government to meet the demand of free health care and education of it’s citizen.

To sum up, education and health care are basic rights of every citizen. I think, government should not be solely responsible for ensuring health care and education free of cost. Individual public and private corporations should come along to make government enable to provide free health care and education.

 

 

Model Answer 5:

Some argue that governments should regulate citizen’s behaviour to make them adopt healthy lifestyles. Although I agree that guidance and intervention from authorities can benefit people’s well-being, I am convinced that one’s freedom to decide how to live should be protected, provided that it does not interfere with other people.

It is true that government should take some actions to make sure that citizens are protected from some unhealthy behaviours. It cannot be denied that it is difficult for some to discipline themselves from yielding up to unhealthy indulgences, which not only damage their own health but also others. Therefore it is important that governments impose restrictions on these behaviours. For example, no smoking should be allowed in public places.

On the other hand, it is absolutely against the respect for basic human rights if people’s freedom of choice of their own lifestyles is completely deprived. They will live under tremendous pressure if they have to worry about toeing the line because of strict government regulations, which, for instance, specify the exact proportion of vegetables in a meal. Therefore, the government should not enforce such laws on citizens.

In my opinion, governments’ priority in terms of public health is to launch awareness campaigns to guide people to choose a healthy lifestyle according to their own situations. It is difficult to define what qualifies a healthy lifestyle, because every individual has different physical condition. As a result, different lifestyles should be chosen on an individual basis, and the government’s role is to guide people to make their own choices by providing sufficient information about health.

In conclusion, governments should set some guidelines to encourage citizens to choose a healthy lifestyle instead of imposing laws on them

 

Model Answer 6:

Healthy lifestyle is one of the most popular topics among urbanites. In this circumstance, government should hold the responsibility to encourage people to enjoy healthy lifestyle, not only because individuals could be gullible to confront healthy issues, but also as a high quality of physical conditions of citizens can stimulate economy.

Firstly, there are some arguments that governments may not be involved in personal healthy issues .However, as not everyone has enough knowledge and qualification on the aspect of health, they may just follow advertisings or unreliable consultants, which, inversely, could increase the potential risk of unhealthy lifestyle, since the inappropriate guidance from advertisings or consultants. Therefore, government should formulate policies to guide citizens to establish healthy lifestyles.

Secondly, with widespread healthy lifestyles, economy has more opportunities to achieve prosperity. With healthy body conditions, labors work more efficiently, elders suffer less diseases and children are promised better development, hence manufactures can produce more, the budget of social insurance and superannuation can be cut and healthy young generations will provide stability to the growth of economy.

Last but not least, as individuals may have different body conditions which mean that governments should be less effective to consider every situation. Whereas, government should enhance infrastructure and use legislation to support the construction of healthy lifestyles instead of covering all the details.

To conclude, governments should support healthy lifestyles both for the benefits of individuals and overall economy.

 

Get More Sample Answer – Writing Task 2

 

Submit your Essay here in the comment section, we will add your essay in our post. 

 

(Collected, Source – Book, Internet)