IELTS Writing Task 2 – Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better


Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?



You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

You should write at least 250 words.


IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay Sample

Sample Answer 1:

Role of family atmosphere in a child’s development is a cause of concern. However, I
disagree with the notion that children of poor families are better equipped in dealing with
the challenges of adult life than those of rich families. No doubt, adversity is a good teacher
of life, but rich parents can also prepare their children to face the problems of adult life by
good education and good nurturing.

A child of poor family has more situations to solve a problem or make a decision as both
parents are working to make both ends meet and children have to look after themselves.
They realise the value of money as they have to live with the barest minimum and as a
result they find it less difficult later on in life when they face financial challenges. In contrast,
the children of wealthy families are born with a silver spoon in their mouth. They are
completely ignorant of the value of money as everything is provided for them in their youth
and expect the same situation in adulthood.

On the other hand, children of rich families study in the best schools and get the best higher
education. They can learn problem solving in such academic institutes. What is more, a
wealthy child may be well trained by a parent who himself has a lot of knowledge of money.
Such parents themselves know money management better and can pass on those skills to
their children.

Life experiences also play a role. Children can have innate ability to face problems of life.
They may have personality traits such as being optimistic, outgoing, confident and open-
minded. Due to these abilities they can solve problems in a better way.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, a poor child may learn to get along without
wealth and a wealthy child may be well trained by a parent to face hurdles of life by
effective education. Therefore, I disagree that the economic situation of the family has a
role in problem solving skills.


Model Answer 2:

Today in the competitive world, money plays very important role in the development of the children. But in the meantime whether it is blessing or curse has sparked a heated debate. Some people believe that children brought up by poor parents are better prepared to face the problem. However, other argues that rich parents brought their children better and they can live successful life. This essay will discuss both aspects before making any definitive conclusion.

On one hand side, some people believe that some children from the less wealthy families might be in the good position. Children from the poor parents learn how to deal with the difficult situation, and learn to fight, struggle and solve the problem of daily basis. As a result, poor children are becoming more hard work and have more patience. For instance, poorer children may have to wait until the birthday for favorite toy or game that they have asked for, and this encourage them to learn the patience. Those children also learn the importance of money which will help them in later life.

On the other hand, some people argue that money is very important for the better future of the children. Wealthy parents have opportunity to send their children in better schools and university. As a result, graduation from the better school and university will secure their future. They will learn social interaction and deal globally. Rich children have less chance of suffering from stress and depression because they have all the facilities and incentives. Furthermore, wealthy parents spent time with their children because they don’t need to work day and night to support their children.

To sum up, I believe that children from the poorer families can better deals with the stress and problems of the adult life than richer parent’s children. Poorer children are more confidence and successful in their life.


Model Answer 3:

Over the past few decades, along with growing interest in child education, people’s attention to the family environment where a child is brought up has also significantly increased. Some people have begun to feel that a child who has grown up in a poor family tend to be better prepared to deal with problems. In my opinion, however, family environment alone does not much influence a child’s ability to solve problems.

A child who was born into a poor family would have had more situations where they had to solve a problem or make a decision on their own. This is because in most unfortunate families, both parents are usually working and children are put into situations where they have to take care of themselves. By contrast, due to their wealth, rich children can experience and learn things that unfortunate children cannot. For example, they usually go to the best schools and receive a higher education there, which prepares them better for solving problems in their life.

However, few would disagree with the fact that each individual is different. That is, problem solving skills come more from life experience. That is, the more a person experiences in life, the more they can use these experiences to adjust, to adapt and to solve problems they encounter. Personality also can be a factor in dealing with problems. A person who is optimistic, outgoing, confident and open-minded can look at and solve problems more effectively.

As discussed above, nature and nurture have an equal influence on a child’s ability to face challenges. Parents should spare no effort to figure out how they can help their children to be independent. I hope that in the future the next generation will grow up as mature citizens.


Model Answer 4:

It cannot be denied that financial background has a profound impact on children’s upbringing. It is suggested that children of poor families are more efficient at tackling problems in adulthood than those from affluent families. I am convinced that this is a precise notion.

Poor children are able to make wise decisions when they reach adulthood because they have got accustomed to hardship from an early age. Poverty means material difficulties. Impoverished parents can never spend enough time on taking care of their children because they are preoccupied with earning a modest income everyday. As a result, those children have to learn to be independent by taking care of themselves and working to support their families. The living environment for poor children is quite challenging. However, it teaches them helpful lessons about material values and human behavior. Children may make mistakes and suffer failure repeatedly, which makes them mature rapidly. When they grow up, those children will appreciate money and assess people’s personalities sensibly.

Conversely, those who are surrounded by extreme care from rich parents have a propensity to be ignorant of the outside world. Since they live satisfactorily with abundant support provided by parents, there seems to be no need for these children to worry about money-related problems. Affluent parents are often overprotective of their children, so they help them to flee from difficulties to the maximum. Consequently, rich children will have trouble deciding by themselves later. More seriously, rich children are often made to study and distance themselves from the society. What they learn about the world is reflected mainly in textbooks and through the mass media, which tend to exaggerate the truth. It is understandable that many rich young adults, without sufficient knowledge of the social life, have an inaccurate view about a number of social issues. Nowadays, summer camps and courses about living skills are organized to help rich children grasp rudimentary know-how about adult life, but learning indirectly is nowhere near as effective as tackling problems head-on and gaining experience afterwards. In short, rich children are likely to have a clumsy approach towards various problems in adulthood due to their lack of practical knowledge.

As discussed above, with regard to problem solving , children from a poor background outdo those from prosperous families. This supports the affirmation that the family background has undisputed influences on children’s problem solving skills.


Get More Topic Sample Answer


Submit your Essay here in the comment section, we will add your essay in our post. 


(Collected; Source: Internet)


  1. It is said that financially-challenged parents can better bring up children and prepare them for adulthood than children coming from affluent families. In my opinion, I agree that poverty does significantly affect an individual’s life positively but so does wealth in giving children the best chances at life.

    On the one hand, parents who have less money can teach children the value of patience. Most children experience delayed gratification and usually do not get the things they want as soon as they want it. For example, parents only give their children presents of toys or clothes on special occassions such as birthdays and christmases. On ordinary days, they are not given treats so this teaches them to be patient and appreciate it better when it is given. Moreover, lack of finances at a young age instill in them the value of managing their money well when they start to earn on their own. It encourages them to work hard and not waste their effort on caprice and overspending. Finally, in some instances, the deplorable conditions that they have experienced growing up are enough to motivate them to study hard and find a job that can put them out of poverty and break its vicious cycle.

    On the other hand, rich parents open up several opportunities for their. children to develop to their maximum potential. For example, children can enroll at prestigious universities and receive the best education possible that are crucial in furthering their careers and widen their future prospects. Aside from this, children who have relative affluence can take travels abroad which will transform them into more cultured individuals which is a great advantage at present when globalization is at its peak. Moreover, an elite social circle ensures these wealthy children have bigger network possibilities that can be of use when they start their working life. Modern societies have proved just how influential connections can be when it comes to promotions and best positions.

    In conclusion, the lack of financial resources is not a hindrance for success for children either raised in wealthy or poor households.