IELTS Writing Task 2 – Aircraft uses more fuel than cars and produces more pollution

0
8596

Aircraft uses more fuel than cars and produces more pollution. Some people suggest the non-essential use of aircraft like international travel should be discouraged.

Do you agree or disagree?

 

Same Topic

 

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

You should write at least 250 words.

 

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay Sample

Sample Answer 1:

It is irrefutable that the fuel consumed by one long-distance flight is consumed by a car in
several years’ time, and the amount of pollution it produces is also more. Therefore, some
people suggest that non-essential flights, including international travel, should be
discouraged. I totally disagree whit this statement. I feel that even though cars produce less
pollution and use less fuel, still we should focus on limiting the number of cars. Discouraging
flights would lead to many other problems.

At a time when people all over the world worry about the decreasing level of fossil fuels and
global warming, it is right to take action to save the planet earth. However, to simply
discourage flights is not the answer. International tourism has become the backbone of
many economies of the world. Many countries are earning from tourism. Many people are
employed in this industry. Many businesses like hotels and leisure centres are dependent on
tourists. So, if we discourage international tourism, it would create new and even worse
problems. Many businesses would go broke and many people would be without jobs.

Air flight also enables intercultural exchanges between countries. The advent of cheap air
fare makes it possible for people the world over to travel regularly, regardless of the
purpose of the trip. Therefore, people have the opportunities to learn from different
cultures and have a better understanding of countries they used to be unfamiliar with. This,
in turn, enhances cultural communications between countries.

What we should do is to limit the use of cars. The number of cars is increasing at a very fast
pace. This is creating too many problems. Cars are using too much of fossil fuels; they are
creating a lot of pollution; they are leading to traffic congestion on the roads and they are
also causing accidents.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, traveling by air should not be discouraged.
Instead, the use of cars should be limited.

Model Answer 2:

Although some people behave and argue that discourage the use of international aircraft will not effect the nature. I disagree to large extent that to use of international aircraft will effect more to nature and uses more fuel than the cars uses.

Other believe that, the aircraft less time to reach the destination for the passengers. It is almost right that it uses high speed and make the all transportation very quickly. Furthermore that aircrafts too huge to transport the people more than 300 at the time to destination.

In addition to make transportation at the huge platform. It is very easy for the transportation companies to import and export the materials up to in the tones. Moreover during the journey, in the bad weather it uses the technology that makes the aircraft steady at any conditions and keep passengers safe. Also make to reach them safe at their destination. So it is not wrong to say by others that it is very useful in today’s hectic life to make easy and make the world too short.

The formost argument to support my view is using aircraft technology in today’s world is too dangerous for coming future life. The most important reason is, it uses more fuel than any other vehicles and produces more pollution. The first argument is that it makes more noise in the atmosphere and it is too dangerous for nature. The people who lives near the airport,they are very frustrate because of the noise created by the aircraft. It is too costly in the maintenance. Many lives gone because of the plane crash. The transportation fees are too high than other route transportation. Apart from this using the magnetic trains is too safe for nature as well as for the human life too.

Thus, in the light of above discussion it can be summed up that, the uses of the air crafts is too dangerous for the future life. I believe that make the transportation easy by using the sea vehicles rather than make it simple by using the vehicles on the ground level like magnetic trains.

 

Model Answer 3:

Traveling offers an opportunity broaden people horizons and recognize about different countries and also cultures. If people are traveling to foreign countries without aircraft or using other transport, it would be caused many inconvenience. However, aircraft can be produced more pollution than other transport and some people suggest tourists are not essentially using aircraft and should be discouraged. In this essay, I would like to discuss the influence of taking aircraft in various demands.

In my personal opinion, tourists are imperatived to take aircraft when they are going to foreign countries, because it waste considerable amount of time to use other transport and it may take much more expenditure on their journey, however, I believe there are chemical substances in fuel for waste gas treatment.

In addition, airplanes offer the tourist a sense of travelling comfort and satisfaction. They also guarantee passenger arrive destination on time and report destinations’ weather and news to satisfy their various demands.

However, the influence of pollution over environment should not be ignored. If we do not confess that our planet is our home, we will never be able to take adequately care of it.

 

Model Answer 4:

Undoubtedly, healthy and educated society is the backbone of a successful country. There is general dispute these days about whether it is government’s responsibility to provide health care and education for free or not. I think this situation calls for the concerted effect of government, individual and private organization as well.

On one side of the argument, there are people who believe that it is one of the fundamental duties of the government to ensure health care and education for it’s citizen. The principal reason for having such belief is perhaps as people in all categories are required to pay taxes to the government, they should definitely receive service from that money. In addition, if tax revenue is not sufficient, government can perform this responsibility by availing loan from international organization. At least, government should provide basic health care and education up to secondary school free of cost. For example, in Canada it is the government who pay for it’s citizen’s health care and education up to a certain level.

On the other hand, there are people who believe that individual public and private organization should run school and hospital and help to release the economic burden on government. If citizen become dependent upon government for health care and education then they ultimately become dependent on the government for everything in their lives. This would lead to a disastrous outcome in any nation because the government cannot support all of its citizen. For example, In a overpopulated country like Bangladesh, it is quite impossible for a government to meet the demand of free health care and education of it’s citizen.

To sum up, education and health care are basic rights of every citizen. I think, government should not be solely responsible for ensuring health care and education free of cost. Individual public and private corporations should come along to make government enable to provide free health care and education.

 

 

Model Answer 5:

The emergence of avian transportation has marked an epoch making for transporting industry. Behind undeniable prosperities that these fast distant routes bring back, some environmentalists spark protrusive concerns about pollution’s issue. however, from my personal perspective the endeavor to prevent the tourists from traveling to shrink the environmental impacted level is a inextricable target. in this essay I will elaborate the radical reasons for this matter.

From the angle of the tourists, the thirty for traveling virtually cover their consciousness of ambient protection. it is highly rare to find a person who concerning about environmental consequence due to their transportation at the point of making decision to get involved in his holiday making by plane.In fact, the convenience and prompt pleasure that the airline supply are what they put in priority. With the power to make the passengers jumping a thousand of kilometers away from their location to remote destination rendering curious customers a tremendous opportunities to fit their demand, then constituting a dramatic surge in number of airline customers annually.

From the angle of the airline industry, it is detrimental to persuade the capitalists to put down their tremendous benefits from flourish market to make the compliance of preserving the biosphere. The strongest argument for this issue would be for the investors who have allocated a huge amount of money on this fields with highly expectation to yield profits form this business. Meanwhile, the traveling customers act as core clients who warrant their consistent operation. The client index plunges are dangerous signs threatening directly their endeavors an put a million of work force at risk of being unemployed.

As concerning reasons analyzed above, the initiative of discouraging people from traveling even though present possible positive effects to environment, it would encounter with significant obstacles due to reality.

 

 

Get More Sample Answer – Writing Task 2

 

Submit your Essay here in the comment section, we will add your essay in our post. 

 

(Collected, Source – Book, Internet)